- Amlogic s905 vs allwinner a64 pdf#
- Amlogic s905 vs allwinner a64 software#
- Amlogic s905 vs allwinner a64 plus#
- Amlogic s905 vs allwinner a64 tv#
For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Amlogic s905 vs allwinner a64 plus#
Odroid-C2 (Amlogic S905), Orange Pi Win Plus (Allwinner A64 quad-core ARM Cortex-A53).
Amlogic s905 vs allwinner a64 software#
This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. Although the software may work with inferior CPUs or reduced RAM.
Amlogic s905 vs allwinner a64 pdf#
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. Lightweight Debian or Ubuntu based distribution specialized for ARM developing. These scores are only anĪverage of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. The few devices that are based on the Allwinner processor are currently quite more expensive with all other features being equal.2K-bit EFUSE, SID, TrustZone, Security Boot Allwinner H6 has more interfaces, a Mali GPU with OpenGL ES 3.1 and OpenCL support, and lightly more interfaces. Rockchip RK3328 is not much more expensive, and has many benefits, except when it comes to 3D graphics performance, but it usually only matter if you plan to play games on the platform, the GPU is usually good enough for user interfaces. but implementation varies a lot between devices.Īmlogic S905X is the weakest of the lot based on the two tables above, but it’s also the cheapest SoC among the three, and in my experience, one with the best support in Kodi, for example. I did not include audio, as all those SoC are supposed to support Dolby TrueHD and DTS HD audio codec pass-through.
Amlogic s905 vs allwinner a64 tv#
I used the same TV boxes as for the benchmark section, except for Gigabit Ethernet relying instead on iperf results from ROCK64 development board (RK3328) and K1 Plus (Note S905, no X, for reference only, but in my experience, all Fast Ethernet interfaces have about the same performance), and NEXBOX A95X for the USB storage performance. Those numbers may vary a lot with further software optimization, configuration tweaks, so they should only be used for reference. For reference, I also included USB 2.0 or 3.0 storage (HDD NTFS partition), and Ethernet performance numbers. Featuresīut SoC performance is only one side of the equation, so let’s have a look at some of the features from the SoCs, which may or not be implemented in some TV boxes. One exception is 3D performance, as Rockchip RK3328 is clearly slower here, and I could notice it while playing games. (3) Vellamo multicore had a warning on Zidoo H6 Pro, so it may not represent the actual performance of the device.Īllwinner H6 has a slight advantage, but during use, it will be really hard to notice the difference between TV boxes with one of those processors, and other factors like RAM capacity and storage performance will have more influence. So I’ve included two scores for overall and 3D Antutu results: actual score / score minus Marooned benchmark. (2) Allwinner H6 is the only SoC to include a GPU supporting OpenGL ES 3.1, which means it is the only one to complete Marooned 3D graphics test (Antutu 3D test has two 3D benchmarks), and the other boxes just got zero since it did not run. Click on one of the links to access the desired comparison. For example, it appears Allwinner H6 can only run at 1488 MHz in a sustained manner, and possibly only reach 1.8 GHz during short bursts (TBC). List of comparisons of technical characteristics between the processor Amlogic S905X3 and the processors group ARM Cortex-A53, with also the respective performance in the benchmarks. (1) Those are the frequencies reported by CPU-Z, and the actual maximum frequency may be different.
0 kommentar(er)
